OwlSheets Students
← Exit

When the Beavers Moved In: Arguing About Cutbank Creek

0 / 10

When the Beavers Moved In: Arguing About Cutbank Creek

Use six years of creek surveys to argue how a beaver pond changed the creek's populations.

Before and after the dam

Read the passage and Table 1, then answer the questions.

A Pond Where the Riffles Were

1Since 2019, the ecology club at Cedar Valley Middle School has studied two 200 m stretches of Cutbank Creek: a lower stretch behind the school and an upstream stretch 1 km away. Each July, students measure the water's depth, speed and temperature, scoop insect nymphs from the creek bed with nets, and sort them under dissecting microscopes in the classroom. They also count tadpoles with net sweeps, take one-liter water samples to count tiny drifting animals called zooplankton under a microscope, and help a state fish biologist, Ms. Hana Kowalczyk, count brook trout. Seventh grader Lucas Ferreira keeps the club's records.

2In September 2021, a pair of beavers moved into the lower stretch. Beavers eat bark, twigs and water plants, and they build dams of branches and mud that back up the water into a pond deep enough to protect their lodge. By the next July, a dam about 1 m high had turned the fast, shallow riffles of the lower stretch into a still pond. The upstream stretch had no beavers and no dam. In April 2025, a spring flood broke the dam, and the beavers moved away.

3Ms. Kowalczyk explained what some of the creek's animals usually need. Most of the mayfly nymphs in Cutbank Creek cling to rocks in fast, cool riffles, where moving water brings them plenty of oxygen. Brook trout do best in cold water, and they are often stressed when the water stays above about 20 °C. Dragonfly nymphs and green frog tadpoles are most common in still, shallow water with plants to hide in. Zooplankton drift with the water, so fast currents tend to carry them downstream.

4Table 1 shows the lower stretch each July. Table 2 adds more counts from the lower stretch and compares them with the upstream stretch, where the club used the same nets, sample sizes and survey dates every year.

Table 1. Lower Stretch Each July (the dam was built after the 2021 survey)
YearDepth (cm)Current (cm/s)Water temp. (°C)Mayfly nymphs/sampleDragonfly nymphs/sample
2020306016482
2021286217453
20221205211214
2023150322622
2024150322525
2025405018208
1.

From 2021 to 2023, the mayfly nymphs in the lower stretch fell by per sample, and the dragonfly nymphs rose by per sample.

2.
Which pattern does Table 1 show from 2021 to 2024?
Question 2 options
3.
Use paragraphs 2 and 3. Why did the mayfly nymphs in the lower stretch fall after the dam was built?
Question 3 options
Table 2. More July Counts (trout in the whole lower stretch)
YearBrook trout, lowerTadpoles/sweep, lowerZooplankton/L, lowerUpstream mayflies/sampleUpstream temp. (°C)
202125135016
2022179604617
20231115904716
20241016854817
2025153124917
4.

From 2021 to 2024, the number of brook trout in the lower stretch fell by %.

Ruling out other causes

Use both tables and the passage.

5.
A club member wonders whether a change in the weather, not the beaver pond, caused the changes in the lower stretch. Which evidence argues best against this idea?
Question 5 options
6.
Zooplankton in the lower stretch rose from 3 per liter in 2021 to 90 per liter in 2023. Which explanation fits paragraph 3 best?
Question 6 options
7.
The dam broke in April 2025. Which statement best describes the lower stretch in July 2025?
Question 7 options
8.
Suppose beavers build a dam like this one in the upstream stretch in 2026. Which TWO results would you predict there by July 2027?
Question 8 options
9.
Complete the chain of causes for the lower stretch. Use words from the word bank. Two words are left over.

Beavers built a dam → the current and the water got → nymphs and brook trout declined → still-water animals such as nymphs and tadpoles increased.

10.
A member of a local fishing club says, “The beaver dam harmed the whole creek. Every population in the lower stretch went down while the pond was there.” Write an argument for or against this claim. Make a claim, use evidence from both tables, and explain how changes to the physical parts of the creek affected its populations.