OwlSheets Students
← Exit

Lawn, Meadow or Wetland? Evaluating Plans for a City Park

0 / 10

Lawn, Meadow or Wetland? Evaluating Plans for a City Park

Use seasonal survey data, criteria and constraints to judge competing designs.

Pollinators through the seasons

Read the passage and study Table 1. Then answer the questions.

Four Plans for Linden Park

1Linden Park is a city park with an 8,000 m² lawn that slopes down to Mill Creek. After heavy rain, water runs across the mowed grass and into the creek, carrying soil and lawn fertilizer with it. Healthy ecosystems provide services that people depend on, such as soaking up rain, keeping water clean and pollinating plants. The city's parks board wants to replace part of the lawn to support more kinds of living things and to protect the creek, so it asked a seventh-grade class at Eastgate Middle School to help compare four plans.

2Plan A adds large beds of annual flowers, which are planted each spring and bloom mostly in midsummer, and keeps the rest as lawn. Plan B turns much of the lawn into a meadow of native wildflowers and grasses that bloom at different times from April to October, with a 10 m wide strip of native shrubs along the creek. Plan C plants a row of shade trees along the creek and keeps the rest as lawn. Plan D digs a wetland pond with a wooden boardwalk.

3The board set three constraints. A plan must cost no more than $25,000 to install and no more than $6,000 a year to maintain, and it must leave at least 3,000 m² of open lawn for a youth soccer field. The board's criteria are more kinds of pollinators and birds, more rain soaked into the ground and a cleaner creek.

4The class first studied small examples of each kind of planting that already grow in the park or nearby. They marked a 10 m by 10 m plot in each one and, on one sunny morning in each season, counted how many different pollinator species, such as bees, butterflies and hover flies, visited the plot in 30 minutes (Table 1). There was no wetland nearby, so Plan D has no plot. The city's engineer then estimated the costs of each plan, how much of the rain falling on the area would soak in, and how much open lawn would be left (Table 2 in Section 2).

Table 1. Pollinator species seen in 30 minutes
SeasonLawnAnnual flower bedNative meadowTree row
Spring2264
Summer39145
Fall1393
1.

In summer, how many more pollinator species visited the native meadow plot than the lawn plot? species

2.
Which pattern in Table 1 best supports the claim that a meadow helps pollinators through the whole growing season?
Question 2 options
3.
Why did the native meadow plot have more pollinator species in spring and fall than the annual flower bed?
Question 3 options
4.
Circle the three measurements that tell how well a plan supports biodiversity or an ecosystem service.

Comparing the plans

Use Table 2 and the constraints in paragraph 3.

Table 2. The engineer's estimates
PlanInstall cost ($)Yearly upkeep ($)Rain soaked in (%)Open lawn left (m²)
Lawn as it is now07,000308,000
A: Flower beds12,0009,000357,000
B: Meadow and shrubs20,0003,000803,000
C: Tree row15,0005,000506,500
D: Wetland pond40,0004,000904,000
5.
Sort each plan by whether it meets the board's three constraints.
6.

What is the total cost of Plan B for the first 5 years (install cost plus 5 years of upkeep)? $

7.

How much less open lawn does Plan B leave than Plan C? m²

8.
Of the plans that meet the constraints, which one does best on both the pollinator criterion and the rain criterion?
Question 8 options
9.
A neighbor says Plan A is the best choice because it adds the most colorful flowers. Which evidence best answers the neighbor?
Question 9 options
10.
Which plan should the parks board choose? Make a claim, use evidence from both tables and the constraints, and explain your reasoning. Name one trade-off of your choice.