OwlSheets Students
← Exit

A Better Model of the Heart?

0 / 13

A Better Model of the Heart?

Trace an argument and test the strength of its evidence.

Read the proposal

This original article presents a fictional school's proposal. Its classroom observations are invented; its explanations of the heart are factual.

More Than a Squeeze

1During a lesson about the human heart, students may squeeze a rubber ball to represent a heartbeat. The action captures something important: the heart is a muscle that contracts. But a ball cannot show where blood goes. Our science department should test a transparent pump with one-way valves alongside a labeled heart diagram, rather than rely on a squeeze ball alone.

2The heart has four chambers. Its right side pumps blood toward the lungs, where blood picks up oxygen and releases carbon dioxide. Blood returns to the left side, which pumps it to the rest of the body. The upper chambers receive blood, and the lower chambers pump it out. Valves help prevent backward flow as pressure changes during the heartbeat.

3In a transparent model, students can watch colored water move through tubing when a flexible chamber is squeezed. One-way valves direct the water forward. Unlike the rubber ball, the pump makes the direction of flow visible. Students could compare what happens when the chamber is squeezed and released. The colored water represents blood but does not reproduce blood's composition.

4A teacher tried the pump with one class after teaching the usual diagram lesson. Before the demonstration, nine of twenty-four students correctly explained how valves affect blood flow; afterward, nineteen did. Students answered the same question both times. The teacher also supplied an additional explanation during the demonstration. These results are encouraging, but they do not reveal whether the model, the explanation, or the repeated question caused the improvement.

5Another teacher reported that students requested extra turns operating the pump. That interest may help sustain attention, but it does not establish understanding. The model's bright blue tubing also matched the classroom bulletin board. Matching colors made the display look coordinated, but tells us nothing about what students learned.

6The pump has limits. A single flexible chamber does not represent the heart's four chambers or its coordinated contractions. Students could mistakenly imagine that the real heart has only one chamber. Teachers should therefore keep the diagram beside the pump and ask students to identify both useful similarities and important differences.

7Before purchasing pumps for every classroom, the department should compare similar classes taught the same content with and without the model. Both groups should answer new questions immediately afterward and again later. For now, the observations justify a small trial, not a claim that the pump is proven to improve learning.

Trace and evaluate

Use the article to answer each question. Distinguish what the evidence suggests from what it proves.

1.
Which statement best expresses the author's main recommendation?
Question 1 options
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 1 that directly states the recommendation identified in question 1.

3.
Which reason does the author give for choosing a transparent pump rather than a squeeze ball to demonstrate blood flow?
Question 3 options
4.
Which sentence from paragraph 3 most directly supports the reason identified in question 3?
Question 4 options
5.
How does the factual explanation in paragraph 2 contribute to the argument?
Question 5 options
6.
Which evaluation of the classroom results in paragraph 4 is most reasonable?
Question 6 options
7.
A reader concludes, “The pump alone caused the improvement in paragraph 4.” Which detail most directly challenges that reasoning?
Question 7 options
8.
Which observation is least relevant to deciding whether the pump helps students understand the heart?
Question 8 options
9.
Why is the request for extra turns in paragraph 5 insufficient evidence of understanding?
Question 9 options
10.
How does paragraph 6 respond to a possible objection to using the pump?
Question 10 options
11.
Why does the author propose asking new questions both immediately and later in paragraph 7?
Question 11 options
12.
Is the author's final recommendation reasonable given the available evidence? Evaluate the recommendation using one supporting detail and one limitation of the evidence.
13.
Suppose the department conducts the comparison proposed in paragraph 7. Describe one specific result that would strengthen the case for using the pump. Explain why that result would be stronger evidence than students requesting extra turns.