OwlSheets Students
← Exit

Six Centuries in Westminster Hall: Limiting English Rulers

0 / 10

Six Centuries in Westminster Hall: Limiting English Rulers

Follow a tour and a timeline from 1100 to 1679 to see how limits on English rulers grew.

The tour

A guide leads visitors through Westminster Hall in London. Read the tour script and the timeline. Then answer the questions.

Tour Script: Westminster Hall

1Welcome to Westminster Hall. King William II, son of William the Conqueror, had this great hall built in the 1090s. For centuries, until 1882, England's chief royal courts met inside it. Many of the steps that slowly limited English rulers were argued over within these walls or close by.

21100: a promise. When Henry I took the throne, he issued a Charter of Liberties. He promised to end some unfair demands his brother William II had made on the barons and the Church. More than a century later, rebel barons used this charter as a model when they drew up the Magna Carta in 1215.

31166: juries of neighbors. Henry II wanted royal justice, not each lord's private court, to deal with serious crimes. Under the Assize of Clarendon, groups of twelve men from each district had to tell the king's traveling judges which local people were suspected of robbery or murder. Over time, the same royal law came to apply across the kingdom.

41297: the charter confirmed. Edward I needed money for wars in France and Scotland. In return for new taxes, he confirmed the Magna Carta and promised that such taxes would be taken only with the common consent of the kingdom.

51376: officials on trial. In the Good Parliament, members of the House of Commons accused several officials of the aging King Edward III of cheating the Crown and the people. The House of Lords tried them and found them guilty. Parliament could not put the king himself on trial, but it could remove men who acted in his name.

61628: a petition. Charles I had forced people to lend him money and had jailed some who refused without naming any law they had broken. Parliament, guided by the former chief judge Sir Edward Coke, pointed to the Magna Carta and passed the Petition of Right: no taxes or forced loans without Parliament's consent, and no jailing without a cause shown. Charles accepted it. The next year he sent Parliament home and ruled without it for eleven years.

71649: a king on trial. After a civil war between the king's supporters and Parliament's army, Charles I was tried in this hall in January 1649. He refused to answer, saying no court had the power to judge a king. The court found him guilty, and he was executed.

81679: show the prisoner. Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act. It said that a jailer must bring a prisoner before a judge, who would decide whether the prisoner was being held lawfully.

Limiting the English Crown, 1090s–1679
DateEvent
1090sWestminster Hall is built
1100Henry I's Charter of Liberties
1166Assize of Clarendon
1215The Magna Carta is sealed
1297Edward I confirms the charter
1376The Good Parliament
1628The Petition of Right
1629–1640Charles I rules without Parliament
1649Trial of Charles I
1679The Habeas Corpus Act
1.
Limits on rulers did not grow in a straight line. Sort each event: was it a step forward for limits on the ruler, or a setback?
2.
Use the timeline.

Sir Edward Coke pointed to a charter that was about years old when Parliament passed the Petition of Right.

3.
What does stop 2 show about how the Magna Carta came about?
Question 3 options
4.
Underline the sentence from stop 6 that best shows the Petition of Right did not settle the struggle between king and Parliament.

5.
A classmate says that after 1215, English kings always respected the limits on their power. Which pair of timeline rows best challenges this?
Question 5 options

Apply the limits

Use the tour script and the timeline to answer.

6.
In 1690, a sheriff keeps a man in jail for months without telling him the charge. Which step on the timeline gives the man's family the clearest way to challenge this?
Question 6 options
7.
In 1300, Edward I wants a new tax to pay for a war in Scotland. Based on stop 4, what had he promised to do first?
Question 7 options
8.
Before 1166, many serious crimes were judged in a lord's private court. How did the Assize of Clarendon change this?
Question 8 options
9.
At his trial, Charles I said no court had the power to judge a king. Which idea did the court act on by trying him?
Question 9 options
10.
By 1679, which had done more to limit English rulers: Parliament or the courts and common law? State your claim, give two pieces of evidence from the tour script or the timeline, and explain your reasoning.