OwlSheets Students
← Exit

A Place to Skate: Build an Argument

0 / 15

A Place to Skate: Build an Argument

Evaluate a student op-ed, then plan your own evidence-based argument.

Read and Examine

All town records and events below are fictional. Treat them as the available evidence for this writing task.

Give Skaters a Place in the Plan

1Last Tuesday, I carried my skateboard past the town tennis courts, basketball courts, and playing fields. At each entrance, a sign told people how to use the space. At the plaza, the sign simply told skaters to leave. Our town has organized places for several sports, but its recreation map lists no public skate park. The council should approve a modest skate park beside the recreation center, with construction dependent on a complete funding plan.

2A designated space would address a problem the town already recognizes. Recreation staff recorded eighteen requests to move skaters away from plaza entrances last month. Those records do not prove that every skater would use a park, but they show that the current arrangement creates recurring conflicts. A park would give staff somewhere to direct riders instead of merely asking them to move along.

3Access matters, too. The recreation center is on an existing bus route and has bicycle racks. In a voluntary school survey, forty-six of eighty respondents said they would try a local skate park. That suggests interest among the students who answered, not among every young person in town. Because experienced riders and beginners may need different features, students should help review the design.

4Nearby residents have raised a reasonable concern about noise. Their homes face the proposed site across a narrow street. I would support a trial schedule with no evening sessions rather than unrestricted hours. A public review after the first season could use resident comments and staff records to decide whether the schedule needs adjustment.

5Cost is another serious objection. The preliminary town estimate covers ramps and paving but leaves out lighting, inspections, and ongoing maintenance. A collection of donated equipment would not close those gaps. Before construction begins, the council should publish a complete budget, identify a maintenance fund, and compare the proposal with other recreation needs. Approval should establish those conditions, not excuse the town from meeting them.

6A skate park would not settle every disagreement over public space. It would, however, give the town a concrete alternative to moving riders from one entrance to another. The council can support that goal without treating cost and noise as afterthoughts. A small project, a complete budget, and a reviewable schedule would give both skaters and neighbors a plan they can examine.

1.
Which statement best describes the writer’s position on the residents’ noise concern?
Question 1 options
2.
Underline the sentence from paragraph 4 that proposes a specific operating limit in response to noise concerns.

3.
A student proposes this claim: “The council should support a skate park.” Which revision makes the claim more precise while preserving the op-ed’s position?
Question 3 options
4.
Which sentence would best explain how the eighteen recorded requests support the reason that a designated park could reduce conflicts at plaza entrances?
Question 4 options

Strengthen the Argument

Choose revisions that use the available evidence accurately and address other views fairly.

5.
Which sentence uses the school survey accurately?
Question 5 options
6.
Which additional piece of evidence would be most relevant to answering the cost objection in paragraph 5?
Question 6 options
7.
Which response most directly answers this counterclaim: “The preliminary estimate is incomplete, so construction should not begin yet”?
Question 7 options
8.
Choose the transition that best connects the evidence to the proposed next step: “The preliminary estimate leaves out maintenance. _____, the council should identify a maintenance fund before construction begins.”
Question 8 options
9.
Which revision replaces “Neighbors who oppose this plan just want to spoil our fun” with a fair, formal response?
Question 9 options
10.
Which sentence would best conclude this argument without introducing an unsupported benefit?
Question 10 options

Plan Your Own Op-Ed

Develop your own argument about whether and under what conditions the town should build the skate park. You may support, oppose, or qualify the proposal. Use the fictional facts in the op-ed; do not invent survey results, costs, or outcomes. Label new suggestions as proposals.

11.
Claim: In one sentence, state your position and any condition that is essential to it. Use your own wording.
12.
Reason 1 and evidence: Give one reason supporting your claim, cite a specific supplied fact, and explain the connection. Write 2–3 sentences.
13.
Reason 2 and evidence: Develop a different reason supporting your claim. Use another supplied fact and explain how it supports your reasoning. Write 2–3 sentences.
14.
Counterclaim and response: Fairly explain one objection someone could raise to your claim. Then answer it with evidence, reasoning, or a clearly labeled proposal. Write 3–4 sentences.
15.
Conclusion: Write two sentences that bring your reasons together and recommend a next step. Do not merely list facts or introduce a new benefit.